Transparency takes a hit as Kerala excludes GST wing from RTI

Thiruvananthapuram: The state govt has excluded its GST intelligence and enforcement wing from the ambit of the Right to Information (RTI) Act, effectively shielding a crucial revenue enforcement body from public scrutiny. The exemption, issued through a gazette notification under Section 24(4) of the RTI Act, mirrors a step taken by the Centre, but it has been pointed out that the central agencies deal with national security and allied matters. Besides claiming that the exemption is in the "larger public interest" to protect the confidentiality of ongoing probes and intelligence sources, the notification dated April 21 cites the central decision to exempt its Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) to cover intelligence work for Central Goods and Services Tax.
"There is no national security angle here. GST enforcement is about financial compliance, not sensitive intelligence. The larger public interest lies in disclosure, not in secrecy... This only protects those wishing to avoid scrutiny," former chief information commissioner Vinson M Paul said.
The govt has cited provisions of the GST Act that allow exemptions from disclosure earlier also to restrict public access to governance data. These include denial of information on several assembly questions on alleged tax evasion by private firms, including CMRL that was accused of making monthly payments to chief minister's daughter Veena T and her firm.
In one such case, chief information commissioner V Hari Nair, criticised the GST department for refusing to reveal the GST payment details of a private company, Santamonica Study Abroad Pvt Ltd. In the Oct 2024 order, the CIC said the department wrongly classified the requested GST information as confidential third-party information under the RTI Act and clarified that there is no bar in sharing the GST payment details of the firm as public information since the details are available with a public authority.
Furthermore, the CIC asserted that Section 152 of the CGST Act doesn't impede providing information under RTI. He emphasised the need to balance the right to information and privacy, and concluded that disclosing tax information does not equate to revealing commercial secrets. 
The state already has a troubled record with transparency as critical reports with serious public implications remain shielded. The Hema Committee report on the film industry, the probe into the child adoption controversy involving a CPM functionary's daughter, and the contributory pension review report—all commissioned using public funds—have either been denied or delayed in response to RTI requests and legislative questions.
The govt's handling of "Operation Palm Tree," an anti-tax evasion drive, is an example of its opacity. In response to an assembly question in March 2025, the department said data collection was still underway. However, a news release from the same department, issued earlier on May 23, 2024, announced unearthing Rs 1,170 crore in fake transactions, a tax loss of Rs 209 crore and identification of 148 fake GST registrations under the same drive. If the news release suggested a completed probe, the assembly response suggested otherwise.
Transparency advocates see this as representing a deeper problem—where the legislature and public receive conflicting narratives on the same issue, undermining accountability. "We now have a situation where a critical enforcement wing is insulated from scrutiny, and routine disclosures are treated like classified state secrets, setting a dangerous precedent," a senior official said.