Case Laws

Commercial Steel Engineering Vs State of Bihar
High Court - Patna
Writ Petition

Interest is not payable on ITC availed but not utilized

June 27, 2019

Amit Cotton Industries vs. Principal Commissioner of Customs
High Court - Gujarat
Special Civil Application

IGST refund cannot be withheld for the reason that higher rate of duty drawback was claimed, even though the petitioner had returned the differential drawback amount

June 27, 2019

Dredging and Desiltation Company Private Limited ., In re
Authority for Advance Ruling - West Bengal
Advance Ruling

No GST on works contract of dredging a river-bed for government entity

June 27, 2019

Borbheta Estate Pvt Ltd ., In re
Authority for Advance Ruling - West Bengal
Advance Ruling

Renting a residential property to a Company for residential purpose is exempt

June 27, 2019

Saurabh Gahoi Vs Pinky Sales
National Anti-Profiteering Authority - Unknown Bench
Anti-Profiteering

'Pinky Sales' guilty of profiteering on the supply of footwear.

June 26, 2019

Pranesh Pathak Vs Bhutani International Medicos
National Anti-Profiteering Authority - Unknown Bench
Anti-Profiteering

'Bhutani International Medicos' failed to pass on the benefit of rate reduction on the supply of Sanitary Napkins.

June 26, 2019

C. P. Rao Vs Unicharm India Pvt. Ltd
National Anti-Profiteering Authority - Unknown Bench
Anti-Profiteering

'Unicharm' failed to pass tax reduction benefit on the supply of Sanitary Napkins. Profiteering established.

June 26, 2019

Sri Krishna Traders Vs State of Gujarat
High Court - Gujarat
Special Civil Application

Show-cause notice under section 130 of the CGST Act cannot be issued without complying with the requirements of section 129 of the CGST Act.

June 26, 2019

Mohammad Azid Ramzani Vs Adarsh Marbles
National Anti-Profiteering Authority - Unknown Bench
Anti-Profiteering

Increasing the base price of a product, post-GST rate reductions, is profiteering

June 26, 2019

Sarj Educational Centre, In re
Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling - West Bengal
Advance Ruling

Multiple services provided to a recipient based on the need of the recipient does not constitute Composite supply. AAR ruling upheld.

June 25, 2019

Page 434 of 513