Radhika Furniture @Radha Devi Vs Commissioner

Date: July 16, 2026

Court: High Court
Bench: Uttarakhand
Type: Writ Petition
Judge(s)/Member(s): MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, SUBHASH UPADHYAY
Sign in to download the documents

Subject Matter

Section 5 of Limitation Act Not Applicable to GST Appeals Beyond Prescribed Period

AppealCondonation of delay in Appeal

Summary

The High Court dismissed the batch of writ petitions, holding that an appeal under Section 107 of the Central/State Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, cannot be entertained beyond the prescribed period of three months plus a further condonable period…

FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT 1. In the present batch of writ petitions, a common question of law arises as to whether an appeal under Section 107 of the Central/ State Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short “the CGST/ SGST Act”) can be entertained beyond the prescribed period of three months and the further condonable period of one month by invoking Section 5 of t…

Sign in to read the full case

Create a free account or sign in to access the complete content.