SVR Developers Vs Assistant Commissioner (FAC)

Date: April 14, 2026

Court: High Court
Bench: Madras
Type: Writ Petition
Judge(s)/Member(s): C. SARAVANAN
Sign in to download the documents

Subject Matter

Taxpayers Not Liable for General Penalty Under Section 125 if Late Fee Paid for GSTR-9 Returns

PenaltyLate Fee

Summary

The writ petition is allowed , setting aside the general penalty imposed under Section 125 of the GST Acts and limiting the late fee under Section 47 to Rs.10,000/- each under CGST and SGST. This decision follows a precedent extending amnesty notific…

FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Mrs.K.Vasanthamala, learned Government Advocate takes notice for Respondent. 2. This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for Respondent. 3. In this Writ Petition, the Petitioner has challenged the impugned Order Impugned…

Sign in to read the full case

Create a free account or sign in to access the complete content.