Vinayak International Housewares Pvt Ltd Vs Union of India

Date: November 26, 2025

Court: High Court
Bench: Delhi
Type: Writ Petition
Judge(s)/Member(s): PRATIBHA M SINGH, SAURABH BANNERJEE
Sign in to download the documents

Subject Matter

Rule 96(10) Omission Applied to Pending Proceedings: IGST Refund Restriction Quashed

IGST RefundRefund

Summary

The High Court allowed this batch of writ petitions, declaring that the omission of Rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules from the statute book applies to all pending proceedings, thereby quashing all demands and notices issued against the petitioners under…

FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF  DELHI  HIGH COURT 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. 2. The present petitions have been filed by the Petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia , challenging the vires  of Rule 96(10) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 (hereinafter, ‘CGST rules’) . W.P.(C) 3154/2023 – Vinayak International…

Sign in to read the full case

Create a free account or sign in to access the complete content.