Lupin Limited Nagpur Vs State of Maharashtra And Ors

Date: November 20, 2025

Court: High Court
Bench: Bombay
Type: Writ Petition
Judge(s)/Member(s): ANIL L. PANSARE AND RAJ D. WAKODE
Sign in to download the documents

Subject Matter

SEZ Unit is entitled to claim the refund of unutilised ITC accumulated under Rule 89

Input Tax CreditRefundSpecial Economic Zone

Summary

The petitioner, an SEZ Unit manufacturing chemical products, filed multiple refund applications for unutilized accumulated ITC (tax period May 2021 to March 2022). The ITC accumulated because the unit's outward supplies (exports) were made without ta…

FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF  BOMBAY  HIGH COURT The petitioner – Company has approached this Court with following substantive prayer: “i. that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari or a writ in the nature of Certiorari or any other writ, order or direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India calling for the records pertaining to the Petitioner’s ca…

Sign in to read the full case

Create a free account or sign in to access the complete content.