Siddhi Vinayak Footwear Vs State of Uttar Pradesh

Date: November 18, 2025

Court: High Court
Bench: Allahabad
Type: Writ Petition
Judge(s)/Member(s): SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, INDRAJEET SHUKLA
Sign in to download the documents

Subject Matter

Penalty Under Section 129(1)(b) Is Not Meant For Cases Where The Owner Is Traceable

Search, Seizure and DetentionE-Way Bill

Summary

The present petition challenges a penalty order issued in Form GST MOV-09 dated October 25, 2025. The penalty was imposed following the interception of goods that were allegedly not accompanied by a valid e-way bill. The High Court allowed the petiti…

FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF  ALLAHABAD  HIGH COURT 1. Heard Sri Parth Goswami, Advocate holding brief of learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Arvind Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the revenue. 2. Present petition has been filed for the following relief: “i) issue a writ or direction or pass an order in the nature of Certiorari quashing the impugned Order in MOV-09 dated n…

Sign in to read the full case

Create a free account or sign in to access the complete content.

    GST Press