Xilinx India Technology Services Pvt Ltd Vs Assistant Commissioner State Tax

Date: July 27, 2025

Court: High Court
Bench: Delhi
Type: Writ Petition
Judge(s)/Member(s): PRATHIBA M. SINGH, SHAIL JAIN

Subject Matter

Interest on Delayed GST Refunds under Section 56 Is Automatic and Statutory

InterestRefund

Summary

M/s Xilinx India Technology Services Pvt. Ltd. filed a petition seeking the processing of several GST refund applications for various periods from September 2019 to March 2024. The court was informed that while the refund orders had been passed, no interest had been paid on the delayed refunds.

The petitioner's counsel argued that interest on delayed refunds is a statutory and automatic obligation under Section 56 of the CGST Act, 2017, and does not depend on a specific claim being made in the refund application. To support this, the counsel cited a decision of a co-ordinate bench of the Delhi High Court in Raghav Ventures v. Commissioner of Delhi Goods & Services Tax.

In that precedent, the court had ruled that if a refund is not issued within 60 days of the application date, interest at a rate of 6% is automatically payable. The court in that case also noted that the payment of interest is not contingent on the petitioner having claimed it in their refund application form. The court in the present case followed this precedent.

The High Court allowed the petition and directed the respondents to pay the statutory interest on the delayed refunds to the petitioner. The payment of interest must be completed within a period of two months. The court held that the payment of interest under Section 56 of the CGST Act is mandatory and becomes automatically payable without any claim if the refund is not made within the stipulated 60-day period.

FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF DELHI HIGH COURT

1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner- Xilinx India Technology Services Pvt. Ltd. under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India inter alia seeking processing of the refund applications (hereinafter, ‘refund applications’) filed by the Petitioner for the periods-September, 2019 to March 2020, October 2021 to March, 2022, April 2022 to December 2022, January,2023 to June, 2023 and July 2023 to March, 2024.

3. The refund claimed in the refund applications are as under:

S. No


 

Period


 

Refund
Claimed/ Sanctioned (INR)
ARN and Date


 

Date of Issuance of Refund


 

Refund Sanctioned by STO Class II /AVATO
1.


 

 

September 2019 to March 202028,21,287/-


 

 

AA070621038 796Z  20.06.202111.03.25


 

 

Ward-94


 

 

2.


 

 

October 2021 to March, 202245,16,416/-


 

 

AA070223031 108R 09.02.202317.03.25


 

 

Ward-93


 

 

3.


 

 

April 2022 to December 202256,05,922/-


 

 

AA070421006 421U 03.04.202317.03.25


 

 

Ward-93


 

 

4.


 

 

January,202 3 to  June,202338,72,587/-


 

 

AA070224091 236C 23.02.202411.03.25


 

 

Ward-94


 

 

5


 

 

July 2023 to March, 2024


 

54,38,674/-


 

 

AA070824012 7555 06.08.202417.03.25


 

 

Ward-95


 

 


4. Vide order dated 28thFebruary, 2025, this Court had issued notice and had directed the Respondents to place a Status Report on record. The said Status report has been filed on 15th April, 2025, as per which, the refund orders have been passed on the dates, as reflected in the above table.

5. The grievance of the Petitioner is that though the refund orders have been passed, no interest has been granted. The ld. Counsel for the Petitioner relies upon Section 56 of the CGST Act, 2017 to argue that the refund order is automatic in such cases. She also relies upon the decision of this Court of the Coordinate Bench in case of Raghav Ventures v. Commissioner of Delhi Goods & Services Tax, [(2024) SCC OnLine Del 1398] wherein the Court has observed as under:

7. We have been informed that pending this petition, IGST refund for the tax period December 2022, February 2023, March 2023 and May 2023 has been sanctioned, but without interest. Petitioner claims that the said refund was credited into his account on 04.12.2023. He gave an application dated 06.12.2023 to the proper officer (Special Commissioner), Department of Trade & Taxes, praying for the grant of interest at the rate of 6% from the date of filing of refund applications till 03.12.2023.

8. Learned counsel for the respondent has raised objection to the grant of interest, arguing that vide FORM-GST-RFD-01, petitioner has only claimed the integrated tax and not the interest on the same and therefore he is not entitled for the grant of interest on the tax amount.

9. Section 56 of the CGST/DGST Act deals with the interest on delayed refunds. It provides that if any tax ordered to be refunded under sub-section (5) of Section 54 is not refunded within 60 days from the date of receipt of application under sub-section (1) of that Section, interest at the rate of 6% shall be payable in respect of such refund from the date immediately after the expiry of 60 days from the date of the receipt of the application till the date of refund of such tax.

10. Learned counsel for the petitioner drew our attention to Para 34 of the Circular issued by CBEC vide No. 125/44/2019-GST dated 18.11.2019, which reads as follows:-

“Section 56 of the CGST Act clearly states that if any tax ordered to be refunded is not refunded within 60 days of the date of receipt of application, interest at the rate of 6 per cent (notified vide notification No. 13/2017-Central Tax dated 28.06.2017) on the refund amount starting from the date immediately after the expiry of sixty days from the date of receipt of  application (ARN) till the date of refund of such tax shall have to be paid to the applicant. It may be noted that any tax shall be considered to have been refunded only when the amount has been credited to the bank account of the applicant. Therefore, interest will be calculated starting from the date immediately after the expiry of sixty days from the date of receipt of the application till the date on which the amount is credited to the bank account of the applicant. Accordingly, all tax authorities are advised to issue the final sanction order in FORM GST RFD-06 and the payment order in FORM GST RFD-05 within 45 days of the date of generation of ARN, so that the disbursement is completed within 60 days.”

11. It is manifest that interest under Section 56 of the Act becomes payable, if on the expiry of the period of 60 days from the date of receipt of the application for refund, the amount claimed is still not refunded. Payment of interest under Section 56 of the Act being statutory is automatically payable without any claim, in case the refund is not made within 60 days from the date of receipt of the application. Payment of interest does not depend on the claim made by petitioner and therefore cannot be denied on the ground of waiver on the claim of interest in FORM GST-RFD-01. Moreover, the question of payment of grant of interest arises only if the refund is not granted within 60 days from the date of receipt of application. No justification has been shown by the respondent for delay in payment of refund within the stipulated period. Thus, even though, the petitioner may not have claimed interest in his refund applications, his claim of interest cannot be denied under Section 56 of the Act as the same is mandatory and payable automatically in terms of the provisions of the Act.

12. In view of the above, we are of the opinion that petitioner is entitled to statutory interest at the rate of 6% starting from the date immediately after the expiry of sixty days from the date of receipt of refund applications till the date on which the refund is credited to the bank account of the petitioner. Respondent is accordingly directed to process the refund of interest and credit the same into the account of the petitioner within four weeks.”

6. Following this judgment as also in terms of the provision itself, it becomes clear that interest would be liable to be paid as calculated in terms of Section 56 of the CGST Act, 2017. It is accordingly directed that the interest be paid within a period of two months from now.

7. The present petition is disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, are also disposed of.

8. All rights and remedies left open.