L & T Geostructure LLP Vs Union of India

Date: May 8, 2025

Court: High Court
Bench: Madras
Type: Writ Petition
Judge(s)/Member(s): R.SURESH KUMAR, C.SARAVANAN
Sign in to download the documents

Subject Matter

Rule 36(4) and its restrictions are valid and consistent with the legislative intent

Input Tax Credit

Summary

In the presented case law, the petitioner challenged the validity of Rule 36(4) of both the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017 and Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax (TNGST) Rules, 2017, essentially arguing that the rule imposes undue r…

FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF  MADRAS  HIGH COURT In these Writ Petitions, the Petitioner has challenged the vires  of Rule 36(4) of both Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as ‘CGST Rules’) and Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax (TNGST) Rules, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as ‘TNGST Rules’). Rule 36(4) of the respective GST Rules read iden…

Sign in to read the full case

Create a free account or sign in to access the complete content.