Prasanna Karunakar Shetty Vs State of Maharashtra
Date: April 15, 2024
Subject Matter
Recovery against a company director mandates subjective satisfaction that he/she was a director for the concerned period
Summary
The case law involves a petitioner who was a director in a company but had ceased to be so before the period for which recovery of Goods and Service Tax (GST) was demanded against the company. The petitioner contended that the recovery against the co…
FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF BOMBAY HIGH COURT 1. Rule made returnable forthwith. 2. Heard finally by consent of the parties. 3. This petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has prayed for the following reliefs: “(a) that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari or a writ in the nature of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or dire…