Jai Shri Banke Bihari Traders Vs Union of India
Date: February 20, 2024
Subject Matter
Provisional attachment orders under section 83 cease to operate after one year. Question of the validity of repeated attachment orders is open.
Summary
The case of Jai Shri Banke Bihari Traders Vs Union Of India & Ors before the Delhi High Court involved the provisional attachment of cash credit accounts under Section 83 of the CGST Act. The petitioners contested the validity of the attachment order dated 04.08.2022, citing the statutory limitations imposed by the law. The petitioners argued that as per Section 83(2) of the CGST Act, the maximum period for such attachment is one year from the date of the order made under Section 83(1). The respondents acknowledged the statutory position that attachment orders cease to operate after one year, yet a fresh attachment order was passed on 13.12.2023, which the petitioners contested. The High Court disposed of the petition, reserving the petitioner's right to challenge the fresh attachment order and leaving the question of the validity of repeated attachment orders open.
FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF DELHI HIGH COURT
1. Petitioner impugns order dated 04.08.2022 passed under Section 83 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [“CGST Act”], provisionally attaching the cash credit accounts of the petitioners.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that maximum period for attachment of cash credit accounts in terms of Section 83(2) of the CGST Act is a period of one year from the date the order is made under Section 83(1) of the CGST Act. He submits that since orders have ceased to operate, there can be no impediment in petitioners operating the cash credit accounts.
3. Learned counsel for the respondents concede to the statutory position that orders passed under Section 83(1) of the CGST Act provisionally attaching the cash credit accounts have a life of only one year and cease to operate after the expiry of period of one year from the date it is made.
4. Learned counsel, however, submits that fresh attachment order dated 13.12.2023 has been passed once again provisionally attaching the cash credit accounts under Section 83(1) of the CGST Act.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that repeated attachment of cash credit accounts in exercise of power under Section 83 of the CGST Act is in breach of the provisions of Section 83(2) and such exercise could not have been undertaken. He further submits that petitioners have not received copies of attachment order dated 13. 12.2023.
6. In view of the above, admitted position that the order, subject matter of these proceedings has ceased to operate, the petition is disposed of reserving the right of the petitioner to impugn the fresh attachment order dated 12.2023 in accordance with law. The question of validity of repeated issuance of attachment orders under Section 83 of the CGST Act is left open.
7. All rights and contentions of parties are reserved.