Indeutsch Industries Private Limited Vs State of U.P

Date: February 18, 2024

Court: High Court
Bench: Allahabad
Type: Writ Petition
Judge(s)/Member(s): Shekhar B. Saraf
Sign in to download the documents

Subject Matter

Penalty cannot be levied under Section 129(3) for clerical error in E-way Bill

Search, Seizure and DetentionE-Way BillPenalty

Summary

The case involves a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, where a company engaged in manufacturing Artist Brushes was aggrieved by an order imposing penalty under Section 129(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act,…

FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT 1. Heard Sri Nishant Mishra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri Ravi Shankar Pandey, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the 2. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, wherein the writ petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed in appeal dated June 22, 2019 and the order dated J…

Sign in to read the full case

Create a free account or sign in to access the complete content.