Brakes India Private Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner (ST)
Date: January 2, 2024
Subject Matter
Lack of a reasonable opportunity for the petitioner is a crucial flaw in the proceedings
Summary
The case involves a writ petition against an order in relation to the assessment year 2018-2019 under the GST Act. The petitioner, a registered person under the GST regime, received a notice proposing to block Input Tax Credit (ITC) for purchases made from a specific trader. The petitioner raised concerns about the lack of reasonable opportunity provided to submit relevant documents and explanations, which led to the petition being filed. The Court allowed the petition by quashing the impugned order and remanding the matter for re-consideration, directing the respondent to provide a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner including a personal hearing.
FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
This writ petition is directed against the order dated 30.10.2023 in respect of the assessment year 2018 – 2019. The petitioner states that it is a registered person under the current GST regime. The respondent initially issued a notice dated 14.02.2023 proposing to block the petitioner’s Input Tax Credit (ITC) under Rule 86-A of the TNGST / CGST Rules, 2017 in respect of purchases made from M/s.Quality Traders on the ground that they are not in existence or are bill traders. A reply was issued to such notice on the same date. Thereafter, it is stated that the respondent issued show cause notice dated 09.10.2023. The petitioner asserts that the said show cause notice was served on the petitioner by e-mail on 25.10.2023. The show cause notice fixed the personal hearing on the same date at 02.00 pm, i.e. within two hours from the time of receipt of e-mail. Consequently, the petitioner contends that a reasonable opportunity was not provided to the petitioner to submit relevant documents and, more importantly, explain the facts and circumstances. The present writ petition was filed in the said facts and circumstances.
2. Mr.C.Harsha Raj, learned Additional Government Pleader, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. He submits that the show cause notice dated 09.10.2023 was despatched to the petitioner by registered post with acknowledgment due. Therefore, he submits that the petitioner was provided a reasonable opportunity and that no case is made out for interference.
3. As a consequence of the impugned order, the petitioner has been directed to reverse ITC of a substantial value. Such action has been taken pursuant to a show cause notice dated 09.10.2023, which the petitioner asserts was received on the date of hearing. These facts reveal that a reasonable opportunity was not provided to the petitioner to submit necessary documents and provide an explanation to the respondent. On this limited ground, albeit without expressing any opinion on the merits in the matter, the impugned order calls for interference.
4. Accordingly, W.P.No.36438 of 2023 is allowed by quashing the impugned order dated 30.10.2023 and remanding the matter for re-consideration. The respondent is directed to provide a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, including a personal hearing, and dispose of the matter by a reasoned order. The petitioner shall provide all relevant documents to the respondent on or before 24.01.2024. Upon receipt thereof, after providing a personal hearing, a reasoned order shall be issued within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the documents. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, W.M.P.Nos.36449, 36450 of 2023 are closed.