Tata Steel Limited Vs Union of India

Date: August 20, 2023

Court: High Court
Bench: Jharkhand
Type: Writ Petition
Judge(s)/Member(s): Rongon Mukhopadhyay, Deepak Roshan
Sign in to download the documents

Subject Matter

Explanation inserted in Rule 89(4) vide Notf 14/2022-CT is not clarificatory in nature and will have a prospective effect

Refund

Summary

The Jharkhand High Court has ruled that the explanation inserted in Rule 89(4) of CGST Rules, 2017 is not clarificatory in nature and will have a prospective effect. The petitioner in this case had availed Input Tax Credit (ITC) of the compensation c…

FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF  JHARKHAND HIGH COURT 2. Since common issue is involved in all these writ applications and pertains to the same assessee for different period, as such all are being heard together and disposed of by this common judgment. For brevity; the facts of W.P.(T) No. 1719 of 2022 are being referred herein. The petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs; (i) For…

Sign in to read the full case

Create a free account or sign in to access the complete content.