Medicamen Biotech Limited Vs Union of India

Date: April 9, 2023

Court: High Court
Bench: Rajasthan
Type: Writ Petition
Judge(s)/Member(s): MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Sign in to download the documents

Subject Matter

No specific requirement in the law that declarations need to be signed in physical mode. Digitally authenticated declarations fulfill the legal requirements

Refund

Summary

The case is related to a dispute regarding the signing of declarations while claiming a refund under GST RFD-01. The petitioner had uploaded all the necessary declarations, including those required under Rule 89 sub-rule (2)(d) and Rule 89 sub-rule (…

FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF RAJASTHAN  HIGH COURT 1. With the consent of the parties, this petition is heard finally. 2. The petitioner, having GSTIN 08AACM1217A1Z9, filed refund application in Form RFD-01 amounting to Rs. 14,34,804/- vide ARN No. AA0812200031153 under the category “supply made to SEZ unit/Developer with payment of Tax” for the period July, 2020 in terms of…

Sign in to read the full case

Create a free account or sign in to access the complete content.