Sandip Kumar Singhal Vs Deputy Commissioner

Date: March 10, 2023

Court: High Court
Bench: Calcutta
Type: Writ Petition
Judge(s)/Member(s): Amrita Sinha
Sign in to download the documents

Subject Matter

As the goods were not confiscated while on the move, imposition of penalty under Section 129 of the Act is erroneous and bad in law

Search, Seizure and DetentionInspection

Summary

Initially the authority invoked the provision of Section 67 but thereafter shifted stand and relied upon Section 68 read with Section 129 for imposition of penalty. The authority was in a fix as to which provision to invoke for imposition of penalty.…

The petitioner is aggrieved by the adjudicating order and the order passed by the appellate authority affirming the same by holding that the petitioner acted in contravention of Section 67(2) read with Section 129 of the State Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ( „ the Act‟ for short). The goods of the petitioner were seized on 22 n d February, 2022 at 2 pm. from a godown upon invoking the pro…

Sign in to read the full case

Create a free account or sign in to access the complete content.