Premium Traders Vs State Of UP
Date: April 20, 2022
Subject Matter
Order u/s129(1)(b) must be passed after providing an opportunity for personal hearing
Summary
It is admitted case of the respondents that the invoice accompanied with the goods in question was issued by the petitioner. Therefore, the respondent no.3 has committed a manifest error of law not to afford any opportunity of hearing to the petition…
Heard Sri Praveen Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri B.P. Singh Kachhawah, learned standing counsel for the respondents. The petitioner is a trader of iron and steel. According to the petitioner he sold 10090 Kg TMT Bar valued at Rs.4,16,717/- to M/s. Umar Enterprises, Ghaziabad, through invoice No.747, dated 04.03.2022. It is the case of the petitioner that he and the buyer both ar…