Radhemani and Sons Vs Additional Commissioner (Appeals), Central Tax, Raipur

Date: December 7, 2021

Court: High Court
Bench: Chhattisgarh
Type: Writ Petition
Judge(s)/Member(s): Sanjay S. Agrawal
Sign in to download the documents

Subject Matter

Term “subsequently held” in section 77 covers cases where the inter-State or intra-State supply made by a taxpayer, is subsequently found by taxpayer himself as intra-State or inter-State respectively

Refund

Summary

Doubts have been raised regarding the interpretation of the term “subsequently held” in Sec 77 (CT), and whether refund claim under the said sections is available only if supply made by a taxpayer as inter-State or intra-State, is subsequ…

1. Challenge to this petition is the order dated 25.06.2021 (Annexure P-1) passed by Additional Commissioner (Appeals), CGST and Central Excise, Raipur (C.G.), whereby the appeal preferred by the Petitioner against the order dated 23.04.2020 (Annexure P-2) passed by the Deputy Commissioner has been dismissed. 2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the Petitioner-M/s Radhemani And Sons (A…

Sign in to read the full case

Create a free account or sign in to access the complete content.