Bundl Technologies Private Limited Vs Union Of India
Date: September 14, 2021
Subject Matter
Swiggy’s payment made during investigation cannot be termed as self-ascertained tax u/s 74(5). Refund of the same is allowed
Summary
The Swiggy owner contended that it deposited Rs 15 crore in the first tranche, followed by Rs 12.51 crore in the second in 2019 under coercion to secure the release of its directors who were summoned and locked up with threat of arrest. It also said…
The petitioner has filed the present writ petition seeking for; issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to refund an amount of Rs.2 7,51,44,15 7/-illegally collected from the petitioner, issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of direction to the respondents not to take any coercive action against the petitioner and its officials during the pendency of ongoing investigation,…