F1 Auto Components Pvt Ltd. Vs The State Tax officer

Date: July 9, 2021

Court: High Court
Bench: Madras
Type: Writ Petition
Judge(s)/Member(s): Anita Sumanth
Sign in to download the documents

Subject Matter

Provisions of Section 42 do not arise where the ITC claim by the assesee is erroneous as it is not a case of mismatch

Interest

Summary

The provisions of Section 42 can only be invoked in a situation where the mismatch is on account of the error in the database of the revenue or a mistake that has been occasioned at the end of the revenue. In a case where the claim of ITC by an asses…

Heard Mr. P.V. Sudakar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. TNC. Kaushik, learned Government Advocate for the respondent. 2. Though no counter is filed, the challenge involves only a legal issue and there are no disputed questions of fact. Learned revenue counsel is thus armed with instructions to proceed with the hearing of the matter. 3. The challenge is to order dated 27.01.2021 levying…

Sign in to read the full case

Create a free account or sign in to access the complete content.