Micro Instruments ., In re

Date: December 11, 2019

Court: Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling
Bench: Maharashtra
Type: Rectification Of Advance Ruling
Judge(s)/Member(s): Sungita Sharma, Rajiv Jalota
Sign in to download the documents

Subject Matter

Allegations made by the Appellant with regard to the error in the impugned AAAR Order which is apparent from the face of record, is rejected

Summary

The limited issue was to ascertain whether there is any error which is apparent on the face of the record i.e. the impugned AAAR Order dated 22.03.2019 as envisaged under section 102 of the CGST Act, 2017. HELD BY AAAR: The primary issue raised by th…

A. At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the MGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean a reference to the same provisions under the MGST Act. B. In the present case, appeal had been filed under Section 100 of the…

Sign in to read the full case

Create a free account or sign in to access the complete content.