Liberty Translines ., In re

Date: September 17, 2020

Court: Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling
Bench: Maharashtra
Type: Advance Ruling
Judge(s)/Member(s): Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Sanjeev Kumar
Sign in to download the documents

Subject Matter

For a single transaction and the same movement of goods, there cannot be multiple consignment notes. AAR ruling upheld.

Classification

Summary

In the subject case, the Appellant is not receiving goods directly from the consignor or consignee of the goods, but from M/s. Posco ISDC Pvt. Ltd., who themselves are acting as GTA, where they are receiving the goods from the consignor/consignee, an…

1. At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the MGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean a reference to the same provisions under the MGST Act. 2. The present appeal has been filed under Section 100 of the Central…

Sign in to read the full case

Create a free account or sign in to access the complete content.