Satyendra Goods Transport Corp. Vs State of U.P. & ors

Date: April 13, 2018

Court: High Court
Bench: Allahabad
Type: Writ Petition
Judge(s)/Member(s): Prashant Kumar, Rajan Roy
Sign in to download the documents

Subject Matter

State Government cannot issue a notification under Rule 138 of U.P.G.S.T. Rules made under U.P.G.S.T. Act 2017 to prescribe documents to be carried in an inter-state supply of goods

Search, Seizure and DetentionE-Way Bill

Summary

1. The fact of the matter is that on the date of incident i.e. 17.12.2017 neither there was any E-way Bill System nor any notification by the Central Government under Rule 138 of the C.G.S.T. Rules 2017 requiring the carrying of a T.D.F. Form or any…

Heard Sri Pradeep Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Rahul Shukla, learned Addl. C.S.C. for the opposite party nos.1, 3 and 4, Dr. Deepti Tripathi, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorari quashing the orders of seizure under section 129(1) as well as imposition of tax and penalty…

Sign in to read the full case

Create a free account or sign in to access the complete content.