Ashis Ghosh ., In re
Date: June 25, 2019
Subject Matter
Filling in the compound, tank, low land etc. with silver sand and earthwork inlayers, including spreading and compacting the same is a works contract under SAC 99543
Summary
The Applicant has procured two contracts for filling in the compound, tank, low land etc. with silver sand and earthwork inlayers, including spreading and compacting the same at the district Correction Home, Baruipur. He seeks a ruling on whether it is classifiable as a supply of sand (HSN 2505).
The AAR ruled that
The Applicant's supply is workscontract service, classifiable as site preparation service (SAC Group 99543) and taxable @18% under Sl No. 3(xii) of Notification No. 11/2017 - Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017
1.1 The Applicant has procured two contracts from M/s Mackintosh Burn Ltd (hereinafterMBL) for filling in the compound, tank, low land etc. with silver sand and earthwork inlayers, including spreading and compacting the same at the district Correction Home, Baruipur. He seeks a ruling on whether it is classifiable as a supply of sand (HSN 2505).
1.2 The question is admissible under section 97(2)(a) of the GST Act. The Applicantdeclares that the issue raised in the application is not pending nor decided in any proceedings under any provisions of the GST Act.
1.3 The matter came up for hearing under section 98(2) of the GST Act on 08/05/2019. lnhis written submission dated 2310412019, the officer concerned from the Revenue did notobject to the admissibility of the Application. The Application was, therefore, admitted on 0810512019. However, while the application was being heard on merit under section 98(4)of the GST Act, the concerned officer from the Revenue, in his submission dated 07.05.2019, objected to its admission on the ground that the supply had already beencompleted in terms of the time frame mentioned in the copies of the contracts. ln his opinion, the scope of an advance ruling should be limited to the question admissible under section 97(2) of the Act and raised before the commencement of the particular activity.
1.4 An advance ruling, as defined under section 95(a) of the GST Act, means a decisionprovided by the Authority for Advance Ruling or the Appellate Authority for Advance Rulingto an applicant on matters or on questions specified under section 97(2) or 100(1) of theGST Act, in relation to the supply of goods or services or both being undertaken or proposed to be undertaken by the applicant. The scope of an advance ruling, therefore, iswide enough to include not only the activities that are yet to take place but also the onesthat have been undertaken. lt is an advance ruling in the sense that the decision isprovided before the questlon is taken up in any proceedings under the GST Act. ln any case, the objection raised by the concerned officer could not be entertained, as the relevantproceedings under section 98(2) had already been completed and the officer concerned had not objected to the admission of the application at that stage.
2. Submissions of the Applicant
2.1 fhe Applicant refers to Order No. JHR/AAR/2O18-19/01 dated 03.11.2018 of theAuthority for Advance Ruling, Jharkhand (hereinafter the AAR) in the matter of M/s P K Agarwala. The AAR observes that in the said case, the supplier is providing works contractservice to a government entity. More than 75% of the value of the supply constitutes earthwork. The supply is, therefore, taxable under Sl No. 3 (vii) of Notification No. 39/2017-IGST dated 1311012017. The Applicant argues the ratio of the above case applies to his supply.
2.2 Al the same time, the Applicant insists that his supply is classifiable under HSN 2505,being a supply of sand. ln support of his argument, he submits copies of the contracts, which provide information as below:
The above information, the Applicant argues, establishes beyond doubt that his supply isthat of goods and predominantly of sand, which is classifiable under HSN 2505.
3. Submission of the Revenue
3.1 The concerned officer from the Revenue submits that the work undertaken involves excavation of earth, the supply of sand, loading and unloading of the same, filling the sitewith silver sand and good earth, spreading and compacting and saturation with water ramming etc. All the above activities carried out by the Applicant are to make a particularland fit for subsequent construction work. Therefore, the service can be termed as site formation/site preparation and clearance service, including preparation service to make the site ready for subsequent construction work, which merits classification under HSN 9954and taxable @ 18% in terms of the GST Tariff (Service) Ad,2017 -
4. Observations and findinqs of this Authoritv
4.1 ln terms of the description of the work, contained in the work orders, the Applicant isrequired to fill in the foundation or plinth by silver sand in layers and consolidating the sameby saturation with water ramming. The work also involves earth work for filling in thecompound, tank, low land, ditches etc. with good earth spread in layers, including breakingclods and consolidating the same by ramming and dressing. lt is, therefore, not a contractfor the supply of goods, but the transfer of property in such goods in the course of preparing the site for construction of the New Central Correctional Home at Baruipur. lt,therefore, amounts to improving and modifying land - an immovable property and is workscontract, as defined under section 2(119) of the GST Act.
4.2 fhe Applicant's reference to the order of the AAR is not relevant. Sl No. 3 (vii) ofNotification No.39/2017-IGST dated 1311012017 applies to works contracts, where theearthwork constitutes more than 75o/o of the value of the contract. As evident from the tablein para no. 2.2, the earthwork constitutes less than 25% of the value of the Applicant's contracts with MBL. Moreover, the State Government holds only 51 .O1% of the shares ofMBL, which qualifies it as a State Government Company for the purpose of the CompaniesAct, 2013, but does not make it a government authority or a government entity, as defined in Explanation 4(ix) and 4(x) respectively.
4.3 The Applicant's supply is, therefore, classifiable as site preparation service (SAC Group99543) and taxable @ 18% under Sl No. 3(xii) of Notification No. 1 1/2017-CT (Rate) dated2810612017 (corresponding State Notification No. 1135-FT dated 2810612017), as amendedfrom time to time. ln this respect, this Authority agrees with the views of the concernedofficer from the Revenue.
Based on the above discussion, we rule as under RULING
The Applicant's supply to M/s Mackintosh Burn Ltd, as described in para no.4.1, is works contract service, classifiable as site preparation service (SAC Group 99543) and taxable @18% under Sl No. 3(xii) of Notification No. 1112017 - Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017(corresponding State Notification No. 11 35-FT dated 2810612017), as amended from time totime. Being a service, the Applicant's supply is not classifiable under HSN 2505.