Reckitt Benckiser India Private Limited Vs Union of India

Date: January 29, 2024

Court: High Court
Bench: Delhi
Type: Writ Petition
Judge(s)/Member(s): DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
Sign in to download the documents

Subject Matter

Constitutional validity of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 as well as Rules 122, 124, 126, 127, 129, 133 and 134 of the Rules, 2017 is upheld

Anti-Profiteering

Summary

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of the anti-profiteering provisions under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) law. These provisions were introduced to ensure that businesses pass on the benefits of tax rate reduction or input tax credit to the…

FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF DELHI HIGH COURT 1. Present writ petitions have been filed challenging the constitutional validity of Section 171 of the Central Good and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short ‘Act, 2017’) and Rules 122, 124, 126, 127, 129, 133 and 134 of the Central Good and Services Tax Rules, 2017 (for short ‘Rules, 2017’) as well as legality of the notices…

Sign in to read the full case

Create a free account or sign in to access the complete content.