Arjun Kumar Parwani Vs Signature Builders Pvt. Ltd
Date: June 28, 2019
Subject Matter
No profiteering established if the builder continues to levy GST@8% post 1.4.2019
Summary
The Applicant has contended that the Respondent had opted to charge GST @ 8% and hence he should pass on the benefit of ITC to him @ 8% and there was no logic in paying GST at the above rate when he could have paid it @ 1%. This claim of the above Ap…
1. A Report dated 30.10.2018 was furnished by the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) to this Authority, after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017 . The brief facts mentioned in the above Report were that the Haryana State Screening Committee on Anti-Profiteering, vide the minutes of its meeting held…