Gurdeep Singh Sachar Vs Dream 11 Fantasy Pvt.Ltd
Date: April 30, 2019
Subject Matter
Activity of 'Dream 11 Fantasy Pvt.Ltd' does not amount to 'gambling' or 'betting' or 'wagering'. Rule 31A(3) doesn't apply.
Summary
(a) Whether the activities of 'Dream 11 Fantasy Pvt.Ltd' (Respondent) amount to 'Gambling’ /‘Betting' ? The Punjab and Haryana High Court has categorically held that these are games of skill and not games of chance. Variou…
1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith and, by consent, the matter is heard finally. 2. Heard Dr. Kantawala, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Nankani, learned senior counsel for the respondent No.3. 3. The petitioner claims himself as a public spirited advocate practising in this High Court, and seeks directions to initiate criminal prosecution against the respondent No.3- a Company…